Web development for HealthTech and Healthcare

Yes, treating it as a special category. That means concrete frontend decisions: never caching clinical data in the browser, never sending it to analytics or third-party tools, closing sessions on inactivity, and asking for explicit, granular consent for each purpose.

We work to WCAG 2.2 level AA as a minimum, with an audit at the end of each phase. We test with screen readers and keyboard-only, because automated tooling catches fewer than half of the real problems.

Yes. The portal consumes an API layer that talks to the HIS or the electronic health record through HL7 and FHIR, so the information is the same in both places instead of maintaining a copy that drifts.

If all you need is to publish content and little else, a template CMS is the honest answer and we will say so. Custom development starts to pay off when there is business logic, users with permissions, integrations with your systems, or performance a template cannot give you.

Because they combine a huge ecosystem with server rendering, which is what lets you have a rich application that is also indexable and fast. Next.js gives us SSR, routing and image optimisation without building our own infrastructure. If your case does not justify it, we will propose something simpler.

We are based in Madrid and work remotely with clients across Spain, Europe and Latin America. If you prefer in-person meetings in Madrid, we do them; if you prefer remote work with short meetings and frequent releases, that works too.

Yes. We audit the code, dependencies and real-world performance to understand what is there, and from that point we stabilise and evolve it in stages, without stopping your operation or defaulting to a rewrite.